This is one of those annoying remasters where it's not bad enough that I can just simply ignore it and return to the original game, because in a lot of ways it's handsomely and respectfully updated for 2016. lack of specular highlights, missing bump mapping, some straight up-sampled textures, not to mention the sound issues. The textures are extremely crisp compared to the original.īut looking at these specific examples is a tad worrying. I was directly comparing the original (PC) and remaster in the Medical Pavilion, and that first room with the writing in blood on the ground looks really good in the remaster. And the textures looked good on first glance. This isn't like the Arkham games where it's blatantly obvious they failed to capture the original mood of the game. I've played through the original countless times and the remaster, overall, at least 'feels' right, on a macro level. In Bioshock's case, I actually thought it was pretty damn faithful and sort of disagreed with the DF's point that the artistic integrity of the game has been mangled. In general, I think there's a lack of respect for preservation of video games - there's always an attempt to 'update' the game for a newer generation with little thought into the care keeping what made the original worthy of remaster in the first place.
0 kommentar(er)
